... and it’s good!

We’re flattered to be reviewed by the mighty Ars Technica. Verdict: Buy it!

http://bit.ly/ar1fXg

Super chuffed :D

Congrats!  And is well deserved!  I’m excited to see the next games the Beatnik team produces!

Very well deserved! And too right you are chuffed! Congrats!

That’s great! I’m sure there will be more to follow.

Great start!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyyaBmOG73w&feature=player_embedded

Another positive review in.

:D

The guy in the video made a mistake though (I think). He said all players get the same amount of experience points.

Sometimes I wish they did.

Our second (written) review

http://www.gamerzines.com/pc/reviews/plain-sight.html

90%!

Robin - 08 April 2010 07:04 PM

Our second (written) review

90%!

Which is an A! Sweet!

Long live Plain Sight! Wewt! Grats on the good reviews guys! =D

http://www.diygamer.com/2010/04/oh-my-god-robot-ninjas-plain-sight-review-giveaway/

Another very positive review.

However, there is some bad news.

The only review so far that actually COUNTS for a Meta score gave it… A 5/10.

http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=19488

Quite frankly, the reviewer has his head so far up his ass, it’s a wonder he can even read the words he types.

Well besides the one guy that nobody really cares about, great job guys

Yentz - 10 April 2010 06:48 AM

However, there is some bad news.

The only review so far that actually COUNTS for a Meta score gave it… A 5/10.

http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=19488

Quite frankly, the reviewer has his head so far up his ass, it’s a wonder he can even read the words he types.

He must have just been tired of getting owned by every other player and wanted to come up with some sort of faux justification for how horribly he was playing.

Habluka - 10 April 2010 08:09 AM

Yentz - 10 April 2010 06:48 AM

However, there is some bad news.

The only review so far that actually COUNTS for a Meta score gave it… A 5/10.

http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=19488

Quite frankly, the reviewer has his head so far up his ass, it’s a wonder he can even read the words he types.

He must have just been tired of getting owned by every other player and wanted to come up with some sort of faux justification for how horribly he was playing.

He ended the review with this.

“I find myself getting more frustrated with the glut of online games catering for those who love a brainless lightshow containing hidden depth that I can’t find the will or motivation to dig up. Please God won’t somebody try something different that needs an attention span bigger than that of a goldfish on the multiplayer front and bring back my faith in gaming? “

Seriously. I stick by my original statement. His head is so far up his ass, he can’t read the words he types.

He’s also an idiot for not figuring out how / why the ground changes colour (and the colours / strength it does change to), if he had the slightest clue he would have figured out how use this to his advantage on the larger maps by letting him know where / what power the other players were….

I get the impression he was tasked to review this, didn’t really want to and spent…. oh 20 mins on a bot server then writing it up.